|
Paul F. Campos is a law professor, author and blogger on the faculty of the University of Colorado Boulder in Boulder. Campos received his A.B. (1982) and M.A. in English (1983) from the University of Michigan and in 1989 his J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School.〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://lawweb.colorado.edu/profiles/profile.jsp?id=10 )〕 Campos worked at the law firm Latham & Watkins in Chicago from 1989-1990 and became an Associate Professor at the University of Colorado in 1990, where he teaches classes on property, punishment theory, jurisprudence, and legal interpretation.〔(Paul Campos CV )〕 ==Biography== Outside the legal community, Campos is perhaps best known for his 2004 book ''The Obesity Myth'' (later published as ''The Diet Myth'') which reviews medical research on the association between higher body mass and health.〔Smith, Dinitia. (''Demonizing the Fat in the War on Weight'' ), May 1, 2004. ''New York Times''.〕 Campos's contentions that obesity is healthy were praised by some sociologists and critical theorists, and overwhelmingly criticized by medical, epidemiological, and statistical researchers with professional training in empirical research.〔(Soowon Kim and Barry M. Popkin, Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina, Commentary: Understanding the epidemiology of overweight and obesity—a real global public health concern, 35 Int. J. Epidemiol. 60-67 (February 2006). )〕〔(Neville Rigby, Director of Policy and Public Affairs, IASO International Obesity Task Force, London, Commentary: Counterpoint to Campos et al., 35 Int. J. Epidemiol. 79-80 (February 2006). )〕〔(David Katz, M.D., Director, Yale Prevention Research Center, Fat, Fear, and the Truly Absurd: The Perils of Ping-Pong Science, 01/04/2013 )〕〔(Michael Fumento, Fat out of Fiction, Washington Times, May 22, 2004 )〕 Soowon Kim and Barry M. Popkin praised Campos for "bringing attention to some of the complexities in overweight/obesity and health relationships and covert financial interests involved in obesity research" but criticized him for "selective use of research", "fallacious interpretation of literature" and "misunderstanding of basic epidemiological principles" and thereby "harm() the most vulnerable subgroups in the population."〔 Neville Rigby criticized Campos's lack of relevant academic qualifications and poor grasp of scientific research, noting that: "It is unusual to find academics concerned chiefly with legal, social, political, and educational issues seeking to challenge the whole arena of the epidemiology, clinical, and public health aspects of the obesity problem. To start from scratch to deal with all their spurious statements in this response is hardly appropriate. The suggestion that there is growing ‘concern’ about the validity of the serious health issues associated with obesity is really quite bizarre, as there has been the most remarkable and growing consensus among an extensive range of governments, academics, health economists, and policy makers relating to the impact of excess weight gain."〔 June Stevens, Jill E. McClain and Kimberly P. Truesdale countered specific claims about the state of scientific research made by Campos.〔(June Stevens, Jill E McClain and Kimberly P Truesdale, Commentary: Obesity claims and controversies, 35 Int. J. Epidemiol. 77-78 (February 2006). )〕 Campos's obesity work was praised by sociologist Susie Orbach for discussing unhealthy body image issues related to an emphasis on extreme thinness.〔http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/1/67.full〕 Other obesity skeptics have cited Campos's work as support for their own views. For example, in his 2010 book ''The End of the Obesity Epidemic'', Michael Gard, an Honorary Associate Professor at the School of Human Movement studies of University of Queensland, identified Campos as one of three scholars (along with University of Chicago political scientist Eric Oliver and Arizona State University exercise physiologist Glenn Gaesser) who have led the way in constructing a counter-narrative to the claims of those who argue higher body weight represents a major public health crisis: "Together, these (authors ) have helped popularize obesity skepticism as a legitimate intellectual position . . . Most crucial of all, they have each contributed to building the case against seeing obesity per se as a disease, demonstrating that the health risks of fatness are, at the very least, highly debatable . . . More recently, Campos has been a tireless, acerbic, and superbly articulate warrior in his extensive print and electronic media work." Two years later, in 2012, Gard criticized Campos for overstating the empirical case for obesity skepticism, and for relying too much on criticisms of the motives of certain obesity researchers. In 2012, Gard wrote: "Paul Campos . . . constantly use() words like 'myth', 'truth', 'lies' and 'liars' when writing about mainstream obesity science . . . Obesity scientists are not 'liars', involved in a 'con' and they are not, by and large, hysterical. How easy it is to dismiss those with whom we disagree by calling them bad and mad."〔Michael Gard, Friends, Enemies, and the Cultural Politics of Critical Obesity Research", page 36, in Biopolitics and the ‘Obesity Epidemic’: Governing Bodies, edited by Jan Wright, Valerie Harwood (Routledge, 2012) http://books.google.com/books?id=eeWPAgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA31&ots=gF3a-woGKM&dq=michael%20gard%20paul%20campos&lr&pg=PA36#v=onepage&q=campos&f=false〕 In 2012, Gard also concluded that Campos and other obesity skeptics have "had little if any impact on mainstream scientific and popular 'obesity crisis' discourse." 〔Michael Gard, Friends, Enemies, and the Cultural Politics of Critical Obesity Research", page 32, in Biopolitics and the ‘Obesity Epidemic’: Governing Bodies, edited by Jan Wright, Valerie Harwood (Routledge, 2012) http://books.google.com/books?id=eeWPAgAAQBAJ&lpg=PA31&ots=gF3a-woGKM&dq=michael%20gard%20paul%20campos&lr&pg=PA32#v=onepage&q=campos&f=false〕 Campos's writing appears on the blog ''Lawyers, Guns and Money''.〔(Lawyers, Guns, and Money )〕 In August 2011, Campos began a second blog, ''Inside the Law School Scam''. Initially posting anonymously, he criticizing other law school professors for not knowing enough doctrinal law or having much practical experience in legal practice. Knowing that his identity was soon to be outed, he claimed responsibility for the blog on August 20.〔(Lawyers, Guns, and Money, "Inside The Law School Scam" (August 21, 2011) )〕〔(Inside the Law School Scam )〕 The blog has attracted criticism from legal scholars, including Brian Leiter of the University of Chicago Law School.〔(Brian Leiter's Law School Reports, "Update on ScamProf" (August 19, 2011) )〕 According to Leiter, Campos's blog contained misleading, inaccurate, and inflammatory statements.〔()〕 Leiter also criticized Campos more broadly for allegedly shirking his job responsibilities through poor scholarship and poor teaching.〔(Brian Leiter, Paul Campos's final bit of revisionist history, Brian Leiter's Law School Reports, February 28, 2013 )〕〔(Brian Leiter, Brian Leiter's Law School Reports, Update on ScamProf August 19, 2011 )〕〔(Leiter, Campos the Scammer, Redux: Now Exploiting the Dead! )〕 Campos's blog attracted support from Deborah Jones Merritt of The Ohio State University law school, who joined him as a co-blogger on "Inside the Law School Scam",〔http://www.abajournal.com/blawg/inside_the_law_school_scam/〕 as well as from Walter Olson at the libertarian Cato Institute.〔http://www.cato.org/events/failing-law-schools.〕〔http://overlawyered.com/2013/01/brian-tamanaha-failing-law-schools-cato-jan-16/〕 Merritt accused law professors of being "greedy,",〔http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2012/08/are-law-.html〕 counseled students on whether to apply to〔http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot.com/2012/07/some-rules-for-risky-times.html〕 or stay in law school,〔http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot.com/2012/07/should-you-stay.html〕 satirized the federal loan system,〔http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot.com/2012/07/loanocare.html〕 and suggested that law school administrators should be held accountable for unethical conduct.〔http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2012/12/deborah-jones-merritt--1.html〕 Olson has criticized law schools for being sources of influential liberal ideas and training grounds for future liberal political leaders.〔http://www.amazon.com/Schools-Misrule-Academia-Overlawyered-America/dp/1594032335/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1371502365&sr=8-1&keywords=olson+schools+for+misrule〕 Another Campos supporter, Brian Tamanaha at Washington University, has also accused law professors, especially liberal law professors, of hypocrisy and greed.〔http://slpr.stanford.edu/previous.html〕 In 2012, Campos self-published a book on law school, ''Don't Go to Law School (Unless)''.〔http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Law-School-Unless-Opportunity/dp/1480163686/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1371396146&sr=8-1&keywords=campos+don%27t+go+to+law+school+unless〕〔https://www.createspace.com/〕 In the spring of 2013, Campos, Tamanaha, and Merritt signed a letter to ABA Task Force on the future of legal education〔http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/taskforcecomments/032013_coalition_revcomment.authcheckdam.pdf〕 about the cost of legal education and the employment outcomes new law graduates. The letter was also signed by several dozen other law professors. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Paul Campos」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|